₹64.60 crore excess expenditure on cancer institute project: CAG report

₹64.60 crore excess expenditure on cancer institute project: CAG report
Written by bobby

LUCKNOW The comptroller and auditor general (CAG) has taken strong exception to the ‘avoidable expenses’ incurred on the Kalyan Singh Super Speciality Cancer Institute (KSSSCI) project, resulting in excess expenditure of 64.60 crore. The CAG report also objected to the work process, wherein services were not procured via the GeM portal.

“There were significant deficiencies and delays in the implementation of the project. The inflated estimate combined with justification statement not being prepared resulted in excess expenditure of 64.60 crore. As the construction agency was chosen on the basis of experience in execution of similar works and turnover based on the estimated cost, an inflated estimate also reduced competition in bidding. UPRNN additionally made excess payment/short recovery/avoidable expenditure of 19.75 crore to the construction agency and architect,” stated the CAG report for the year ended March 31, 2020, tabled in the state assembly on Wednesday.

“The construction work is not of my tenure. I joined as director in 2021. However, inquiry would be conducted if directed by the authorities,” said Prof RK Dhiman, SGPGI director and in-charge of the cancer institute.

“Directions of the state government regarding procurement of material and services through GeM portal were not adhered to,” said the report.

In August 2017, the state government had directed that all departments and their subordinate institutions shall procure materials and services listed on Government e-MarketPlace (GeM) through GeM portal only. The reply from UPRNN was not accepted by the auditor.

“The interest recovered on mobilisation advance was not credited to the government account. Audit noticed that UPRNN had recovered 13.69 crore from the bills of the construction agency towards interest on mobilisation advance that should have been credited to the government account. In reply, management/government stated that mobilisation advance is given to a sub-contractor to mobilise men and material at site of work for smooth and speedy work. The reply is not acceptable because mobilisation advance was given to the construction agency out of government funds received by UPRNN in its capacity as the executing agency and not out of its own funds,” said the CAG report.

The report said, “Due to incorrect application of power factor for conversion of demand from kw to kva, provision of one transformer, two DG sets and two voltage stabilisers was made in excess of requirement resulting in avoidable expenditure of 2.30 crore.”

As per the agreement entered into with the construction agency, the work was to be completed by 22 October, 2017. Audit noticed that even after lapse of over four years from the scheduled date of completion, the work was still incomplete (November 26, 2021), said the report.

The report listed 14 items specifically, for which inflated prices were paid – including light fixtures, steel reinforcement, horizontal bed head panels.

Source link

About the author


Leave a Comment